翻訳と辞書 |
R (National Union of Journalists) v Central Arbitration Committee : ウィキペディア英語版 | R (National Union of Journalists) v Central Arbitration Committee
''R (National Union of Journalists) v Central Arbitration Committee'' () (EWCA Civ 1309 ) is an UK labour law case, concerning collective bargaining. ==Facts== The NUJ contended that its application for recognition at the ''Racing Post'' newspaper was not inadmissable under TULRCA 1992 Schedule A1, paragraph 35. This prescribes that where a collective agreement is ‘already in force’ the procedure cannot take place. The Central Arbitration Committee had decided this was the situation since the Mirror News Group already had a recognition agreement with the British Association of Journalists. The BAJ formed in the early 1990s as a breakaway from the NUJ, but is independent and affiliated to the Trades Union Congress. It signed an agreement for the Sports Division of the Mirror in 2003, shutting out the NUJ. They only had one member in the Sports Division. A majority of people in the bargaining unit were in favour of statutory recognition of the NUJ. The NUJ argued an agreement should be considered ‘already in force’ for the purpose of paragraph 35, and in any case the CAC decision breached ECHR article 11 and article 14.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「R (National Union of Journalists) v Central Arbitration Committee」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|